Eo Audits

Proclamation 10903: the Alien Enemies Act enforcement record

Indicators: Judicial independence & compliance with court orders, Selective application of law to minorities & critics, Executive aggrandizement vs. Congress & statutory limits

TL;DR

Proclamation 10903 invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to remove alleged Tren de Aragua members without immigration-court process. The enforcement record shows one removal wave of roughly 261 people to El Salvador on March 15, 2025, then comprehensive judicial blocking, a disputed non-compliance over flights that did not turn back, and a standing ban under which the Act is currently not enforced.

Audit — written July 2026, covering the order and its enforcement through publication.

What the order directs

Proclamation 10903 was signed March 14, 2025, made public March 15, and published in the Federal Register March 20, 2025 (Immigration Policy Tracking Project). It invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, declaring that members of Tren de Aragua from Venezuela are conducting "irregular warfare" and "hostile actions" against the United States (Immigration Policy Tracking Project). It directed the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security to use "all available resources" to apprehend, detain, and remove Venezuelan nationals aged 14 or older who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents and are determined to be members, and authorized seizure of property linked to the group (Immigration Policy Tracking Project).

On March 14, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued "Guidance for Implementing the Alien Enemies Act," authorizing apprehension without warrants and establishing a point-rubric, Form AEA-21A, to validate membership (Immigration Policy Tracking Project). The stated predicate was the State Department's February 20, 2025 designation of Tren de Aragua as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (The White House). The asserted legal authority is the 1798 Act, a wartime statute; the Congressional Research Service flags as disputed whether a president may invoke it in peacetime against a non-state gang rather than a recognized foreign nation at war (CRS).

What enforcement shows

  • 2025-02-20: State Department designates Tren de Aragua a Foreign Terrorist Organization, the proclamation's stated predicate (The White House). [announcement]
  • 2025-03-14: Proclamation signed; Bondi guidance issued authorizing warrantless apprehension and the AEA-21A membership rubric (Immigration Policy Tracking Project). [announcement]
  • 2025-03-15: Three planes carrying more than 250 alleged members are flown to El Salvador's CECOT prison, the order's first major enforcement action (FactCheck.org). [executed]
  • 2025-03-16: BBC reports 261 people removed to El Salvador notwithstanding Judge Boasberg's same-day order blocking such removals; the White House said the flights had already left US airspace before the written order issued (BBC). [executed, disputed non-compliance]
  • After 2025-03-15: No sustained removals under the Act occurred; the administration's stated intent to remove members without immigration-court process did not materialize into a continuing program (Vandenberg Law). [non-execution]
  • Through publication: Human-rights trackers count more than 280 removals to CECOT, more than the initial wave alone accounts for (NILC). [executed removals]
  • Through publication: El Salvador acknowledged to UN investigators that the United States retains "jurisdiction and legal responsibility" for the detainees, contradicting public claims they were under Salvadoran custody (Democracy Forward). [executed]

The announced directive reached every Venezuelan national aged 14 or older determined to be a member, nationwide, using "all available resources." The executed record in the payload is a single wave of roughly 261 removals on one day, after which no sustained removals occurred and the Act sits unenforced under a standing court ban. The gap between the sweep of the directive and the size of the executed record is the central fact of this section.

The court record

This is where the audit's weight sits. On 2025-03-15, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order and class action blocking deportations, ruling the proclamation failed to provide the notice and hearing due process requires before removal, and ordering flights that had already departed to turn back (The Hill; CRS). The flights did not turn back; the Justice Department argued the order was not binding because the planes were outside US airspace (Vandenberg Law). Boasberg subsequently opened a contempt investigation into the administration for flying migrants despite the prohibition, finding "significant evidence" that many were imprisoned on weak claims (NILC). The payload records the inquiry's opening but not its appellate disposition; that outcome is not established in the record available here.

On 2025-04-07, the Supreme Court, per curiam, vacated the TRO, ruling that challenges must be brought as habeas corpus petitions in the district of confinement; all nine justices agreed that individuals subject to removal are entitled to notice and judicial review (Supreme Court; CRS). The Court separately blocked removal of Venezuelan men in custody in AARP v. Trump (Center for Immigration Studies). On 2025-05-14, a federal district judge in Pennsylvania ruled the president may use the Act to deport Venezuelans shown to be members, a ruling in the administration's favor (NPR). On 2025-06-04, a district court ordered the government to facilitate habeas relief for Venezuelans already removed to CECOT, with an appeal pending at the D.C. Circuit (CRS). The Supreme Court also ordered the administration to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia, deported in violation of a court order (NILC). On 2025-12-22, a court certified a class of the March deportees, found they were denied due-process rights, and ordered the government to propose a hearing plan (CRS). The proclamation was not vacated; courts issued stays and blocks, and the ban on using the Act for deportation remains in place (Vandenberg Law; FAIR).

The rhetoric wrapper

The proclamation's own text supplies the framing: Tren de Aragua is cast as conducting "irregular warfare" and "hostile actions," and the order sits within the administration's broader "invasion" declaration at the border, under which ICE was directed to detain "to the maximum extent authorized by law" (Immigration Policy Tracking Project; American Immigration Council). The packaging presents mass removal as a wartime response rather than an immigration-enforcement expansion.

On December 31, 2025, the official DHS account posted an appropriated beach painting captioned "America after 100 million deportations," with the agency's own caption "The peace of a nation no longer besieged by the third world" (Common Dreams). Classified normalization-messaging / demographic-group, per config/rhetoric-taxonomy.md: the image aestheticizes the policy outcome of mass removal rather than threat-framing a named individual. This section describes the packaging; it does not score it, and no rhetoric-track proposal follows from it here.

Metric fit

Indicator Criterion Direction
Judicial independence & compliance with court orders Tier 1 “Defying or slow-walking court orders” Raises
Selective application of law to minorities & critics Tier 3 “Selective enforcement patterns targeting identity groups or critics under facially neutral statutes” Raises
Executive aggrandizement vs. Congress & statutory limits Tier 2 “Governing by unilateral decree beyond statutory authority” Raises

Contested. The courts indicator's raises names 'Defying or slow-walking court orders,' and the March 15 flights that did not turn back after Judge Boasberg's order supply exactly that; its lowers names cases where 'the executive loses in court and complies with the ruling,' which the standing non-enforcement and the litigated-not-defied posture after April 7 equally supply.

Evidence for an authoritarian reading

  • cross-source pattern The March 15 flights that continued despite Judge Boasberg's order, described above, are the clearest instance of possible court-order defiance in this record (BBC; Vandenberg Law).
  • single report The contempt inquiry described above, plus the Supreme Court's order returning Kilmar Abrego Garcia, deported in violation of a court order, are further instances (NILC).
  • court-verified Courts repeatedly found the proclamation denied due process, including the December 22 class certification described above (CRS).

Evidence against / good-faith explanations

  • single report The standing non-enforcement described above means the Act cannot currently be used for deportation (Vandenberg Law).
  • single report On scale the executed record falls far short of Obama's roughly 3.08 million FY2009-2016 removals, the named same-category comparator, against the roughly 261 removed here (Migration Policy Institute).
  • court-verified The unanimous April 7 ruling described above shows the executive litigating within, not against, the judicial process (Supreme Court; CRS).

Reading

Zone scale: Contrary signal, Within precedent, Contested (current reading), Pattern-consistent, Bright line.

Precedent: Mixed precedent. See Reading.

The courts indicator's raises names 'Defying or slow-walking court orders,' and the March 15 flights that did not turn back after Judge Boasberg's order supply exactly that; its lowers names cases where 'the executive loses in court and complies with the ruling,' which the standing non-enforcement and the litigated-not-defied posture after April 7 equally supply. It is the legality of that one non-compliance episode that remains contested, because the order was oral, disputed as to airspace, and vacated by the Supreme Court on April 7, 2025; the record does not discriminate cleanly between defiance and a colorable jurisdictional argument. Precedent is mixed: the immigration-enforcement-scale comparator, Obama's removal volume, is named; the Alien Enemies Act's peacetime invocation against a non-state gang is none-found in the payload record and is unprecedented in kind within the record available to this entry; the court-compliance category, which drives this reading, has no same-category comparator for a brief non-compliance episode followed by litigated compliance anywhere in the base-rate reference, research findings, or feed items available to this entry.

What would change this reading

A final, non-appealable order that the administration then refused to comply with, or, conversely, an appellate ruling vacating the contempt inquiry and finding the March 15 removals were lawfully conducted, would move this reading off contested.

Sources

  1. Proclamation: Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding Tren de Aragua (tracker), Immigration Policy Tracking Project (2025-03-20)
  2. Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of the United States by Tren de Aragua, The White House (2025-03-15)
  3. The Alien Enemies Act and Tren de Aragua: Legal Questions (LSB11295), Congressional Research Service
  4. Trump Issues Executive Order Invoking Alien Enemies Act Against Tren de Aragua, Vandenberg Law
  5. SCOTUS Blocks Alien Enemy Act Removals of Tren de Aragua Members, Center for Immigration Studies
  6. Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Blocks Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act, FAIR
  7. Tracking the CECOT Disappearances, National Immigration Law Center
  8. Q&A on the Alien Enemies Act and Tren de Aragua in the U.S., FactCheck.org (2025-03-19)
  9. Trump administration deports migrants despite court order, BBC (2025-03-16)
  10. Judge blocks Trump administration from implementing Alien Enemies Act, The Hill (2025-03-15)
  11. Judge rules Trump can use Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans in Pennsylvania, NPR (2025-05-14)
  12. Application 24A931 (per curiam order), Supreme Court of the United States (2025-04-07)
  13. UN document contradicts administration's El Salvador prison claim, Democracy Forward
  14. DHS posts 'America after 100 million deportations' imagery, Common Dreams (2025-12-31)
  15. Investigating ICE Changes to Parole Policies (FOIA request), American Immigration Council
  16. The Obama Record on Deportations: Deporter in Chief or Not?, Migration Policy Institute
  17. Authoritarianism, Reform, or Capture? Democracy in Trump's America, American Affairs (2025-08-01)

Entities: Alien Enemies Act proclamation litigation (J.G.G. v. Trump), CECOT El Salvador removal flights, Tren de Aragua designation and removals, Judge James Boasberg, Department of Homeland Security